Identity + authority
Which agent/service acted, for whom, and what it was allowed to do.
USE CASES
Evidence for the actions that matter.
LoopGrid is most useful where an AI system can change real business state. Start with one workflow where authority, policy, human oversight and the downstream outcome need to remain reconstructable after the fact.
01Mortgage & creditloan files · income · fraud · servicing
02Financial & riskrefunds · reconciliation · claims · transactions
03Enterprise agentsrecords · permissions · back-office state
04Voice & customer opsconversation → tool action → confirmed result
START WITH A STATE CHANGE
One evidence model across different agent workflows.
The industry changes, but the evidence question is consistent: who or what acted, under which authority and policy, what oversight occurred, which external action was attempted, and what the downstream system reported happened.
01 · MORTGAGE + CREDIT
Loan, income and risk workflows
Preserve evidence across lender, vendor and loan-system boundaries without turning LoopGrid into an underwriting model.
Explore use case → 02 · FINANCIAL + RISKMoney movement, exceptions and risk actions
Connect approval lineage to refunds, payment exceptions, reconciliations, claims and system-confirmed outcomes.
Explore use case → 03 · ENTERPRISE AGENTSRecords, permissions and back-office actions
Preserve delegated authority and the resulting state change across CRM, identity, service and internal systems.
Explore use case → 04 · VOICE + CUSTOMER OPSConnect the conversation to the action that followed
Complement native call logs with portable evidence spanning authorization, tool execution and the business system's response.
Explore use case →WHAT TO CAPTURE
The common evidence path.
LoopGrid is not a separate product for each vertical. These pages show different manifestations of the same provider-neutral evidence infrastructure.
Policy + context
Which rule, model context or workflow version applied when the action was proposed.
Human oversight
Approval, rejection, correction or intervention preserved as append-only history.
Action + outcome
The external tool request and the result reported by the downstream system.
CHOOSING THE FIRST WORKFLOW
Prefer a narrow action with a clear system of record.
The fastest evaluation is not a broad governance rollout. Choose one state-changing workflow, one authoritative downstream system, and one concrete question an investigator or customer might ask later.
01State changing
The agent can move money, modify a record, change access or trigger another consequential operation.
02Reviewable
There is a policy, threshold, human approval or business rule worth preserving.
03Cross-system
The important evidence spans more than a single dashboard or vendor log.
DESIGN PARTNER
Bring one consequential workflow.
Start with synthetic data, verify the evidence independently, then decide whether a real integration is worth pursuing.